In the wake of the midterm elections on Tuesday, tempers seem to be running hot at the White House: Attorney-General Jeff Sessions, who drew the president’s ire by recusing himself from the Russia investigation, handed in his resignation on Wednesday , not long after Trump shouted down several reporters during a press conference. After Jim Acosta refused to give the microphone to an aide, Trump he was “the enemy of the people” because he spread “fake news,” and then yelled at two other reporters and told them to sit down when they tried to ask a question. The White House later said Acosta’s official press pass had been “until further notice.”

Is this a sign of what the US is in for with a divided Congress, or just more of the same from a notoriously combative president? That remains to be seen, but we shouldn’t let the sideshow antics of the White House distract us from other important developments outside the US political arena—including the fact that Facebook is being held accountable, at least in a small way, for its role in the ongoing violence against the Rohingya people in Myanmar. On Tuesday, the social network released it commissioned on the human rights impact of its presence in that country, from a non-profit group called Business for Social Responsibility (did Facebook try to bury the report by releasing it on the same day as the midterm elections? Let’s just say some people wondered about the convenient timing).

According to at Facebook, the report “concludes that, prior to this year, we weren’t doing enough to help prevent our platform from being used to foment division and incite offline violence.” However, the social network says the report acknowledges that it is now “taking the right corrective actions,” including hiring more people in Myanmar to moderate content on the site to prevent hate speech against the Rohingya from spiraling even further out of control. The report also says Facebook should have a formal human rights policy as it applies to content moderation, something the company said it is “looking into” doing.

But is Facebook really doing all it can to try to halt the spread of violence? Not according to the United Nations’ Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar, which on Tuesday looking into the causes of the genocide that has taken place against the Rohingya in that country. Among other recommendations, the UN report says any commercial entity doing business in Myanmar should not “enter into an economic or financial relationship with the security forces,” including the military police, known as the Tatmadaw. Facebook of pages and accounts associated with the Myanmar military in August, but Myanmar observers say those pages were used to distribute hate and foment violence for months, if not years, before Facebook finally took action against them.

But the UN’s number one call is for transparency. The UN report that Facebook and other social media platforms allow for “an independent and thorough examination” of how their networks have been used to spread hatred. But the report notes that despite Facebook’s promise to do better on these kinds of issues than it has in the past, it has refused to provide country-specific data about hate speech on its platform, which the UN said “is imperative to assess the problem and the adequacy of its response.” The report also says that before Facebook enters a new market—particularly one with volatile ethnic or other tensions—it should conduct a human-rights assessment and take whatever measures it can to reduce the risk of fomenting violence, something it clearly didn’t do in Myanmar.

Here’s more on Facebook and its connection to violence in countries like Myanmar:

Reporters for The New York Times and Foreign Policy magazine who are based in Asia about the power that Facebook has in countries such as Thailand, Cambodia and Myanmar, where for many people the social network is the internet.
A group of six civil-society organizations in Myanmar to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg in April, saying the social network’s behavior in that country relied too much on third parties, failed to engage with local human-rights workers on important issues and exhibited “a lack of transparency.”
The Atlantic explained in 2016 from being a country with a very low penetration of cell phones to one in which almost everyone has a smartphone, and almost all have Facebook installed on them by default.
Facebook-owned WhatsApp for multiple deaths in India, but the company says cracking down on such content is difficult because messages are encrypted. Some believe WhatsApp is just a convenient scapegoat for the violence in India, and that are deeper than that.

Other notable stories:

For more detail on the president’s attacks on CNN correspondent Jim Acosta and a number of other reporters, The Washington Post has. Trump also he couldn’t understand several foreign reporters who asked questions, and accused PBS reporter Yamiche Alcindor of asking a racist question.
Gab, the alternative to Twitter that has been accused of hosting hate speech, from the internet after it was banned by its domain registrar and its hosting service. But it has found a new host and , and is also using Cloudflare, the proxy service that shut off neo-Nazi site The Daily Stormer last year.
The Committee to Protect Journalists the immediate release of two of its staffers, Angela Quintal and Muthoki Mumo, who had their passports seized by the authorities in Tanzania and were taken to an unknown location. They were but only after hours of interrogation and attempts to access their email.
Axios CEO Jim VandeHei says the digital news startup is on track to to $20 million this year, and there is an outside chance that it could turn a profit. Axios has raised a total of $30 million in venture financing.
CJR Managing Editor Betsy Morais writes about the seemingly endless reliance that cable networks and journalists in general have on and terminology to cover Election Day.
A new survey from the Pew Research Center says the number of people who get news from YouTube has increased, but of those surveyed said they sometimes encounter videos that are false or untrue.

Mathew Ingram is CJR’s chief digital writer. Previously, he was a senior writer with Fortune magazine. He has written about the intersection between media and technology since the earliest days of the commercial internet. His writing has been published in the Washington Post and the Financial Times as well as by Reuters and Bloomberg.

Mathew Ingram

Facebook slammed by UN for its role in Myanmar genocide